Assessment 1 – Prosected Specimen and Video (25%); Peer Feedback (5%)
This is an assignment with a practical dissection component as well as a presentation, where students will dissect a specimen for the purposes of educating others in an anatomical concept and prepare and deliver a high-quality video aimed at teaching students about key anatomical structures. Students will be graded on both the quality of the dissection as well as their ability to communicate clearly using effective teaching strategies. Students will develop the ability to provide effective and constructive feedback to their peers which is feasible and actionable. Students will provide feedback on a teaching video using instructor provided prompts. Students will be required to provide feedback for the video given the context of its potential to be used in a modern online course as well as their peer’s ability to utilize anatomical pedagogy to demonstrate and communicate concepts. Prosected specimen and video submission are cumulatively worth 25% and peer feedback is worth 5%.
Assessment 2– Pedagogical Reflection (10%)
This is a written assignment that requires students to critically evaluate their own experiences with prosection as well as research through a variety of open-ended prompts outlined by the instructor. Students will reflect on topics such as skills that they have gained, areas of improvement, human and animal cadaveric dissection, significance of their research, and impacts of knowledge gaps, among others. This is an individual assignment and student responses will remain confidential shared only with the course instructor.
Assessment 3 – Summative Manuscript (45%); Manuscript Peer Feedback (10%); Collaborative Peer Feedback (5%)
Part 1: Students will devise and carry out a thoughtful and complete research project under the mentorship of their instructors and through collaboration with their assigned research team. At the end of the course, students will submit a summative written assignment about their research objectives, methods, results, and significance of the project. The written document will be formatted as a research manuscript tailored to the editing preferences of an academic journal chosen by the course instructors. Students will have to delve into the peer-reviewed literature of their topic to justify the significance of their research and creatively develop solutions to complex research problems. Students will submit iterative and formative drafts of their progress (non-graded) as guided by the instructor, incorporating feedback into successive versions of the paper. The completed submission (graded) will adhere to the high standards of contemporary published work in the Anatomical Sciences and will be a culmination of the research team’s efforts throughout the duration of the course. This is a group assignment, though students will be graded individually based on the quality of their respective contribution to the manuscript. Manuscript submission is worth 45%.
Part 2: Students will develop the ability to provide effective and constructive feedback to their peers which is feasible and actionable. Students will provide feedback on a summative research manuscript, and the collaborative team-based research experience using instructor provided prompts. Feedback regarding the summative research manuscript will be given through the lens of an external reviewer of an academic journal, requiring students to think critically about the components of a successful published manuscript. Students will also provide feedback to their research team about the collaborative work environment fostered throughout the course, reflecting on skills that should continue to be developed through professional careers. Manuscript peer feedback is worth 10%, and group collaboration peer feedback is worth 5%.